Syncretism in religion and politics leading to the Antichrist - Part Six

The PanEuropa Movement which leads to the ten horns of the Beast worldwide and the Tuebingen Modernist Movement which leads to the False Prophet are allied in their service to the Antichrist and will spend eternity in hell with the Devil and the Antichrist and the False Prophet.

PanEuropa Movement

God and His Messiah Jesus Christ our Lord - our right and duty to witness to Him: WHKMLA : A Utopian Concept Becoming Political Reality: Richard Nikolaus Graf Coudenove Kalergi and the Paneuropa Movement from 1920 to 1950

Tuebingen Modernist Movement

God and His Messiah Jesus Christ our Lord - our right and duty to witness to Him: Karl Adam - the beginning of 20th Century Tuebingen Modernism in force


Palestine Cry: Syncretism in religion and politics leading to the Antichrist - Part One

Palestine Cry: Syncretism in religion and politics leading to the Antichrist - Part Two

Palestine Cry: Syncretism in religion and politics leading to the Antichrist - Part Three

Palestine Cry: Syncretism in religion and politics leading to the Antichrist - Part Four

Palestine Cry: Syncretism in religion and politics leading to the Antichrist - Part Five

Syncretism in religion and politics leading to the Antichrist - Part Six

THE SYNARCHY: A "JUDEO-CHRISTIAN" THEOCRACY

THE SYNARCHY

“JUDEO-CHRISTIAN” THEOCRACY

FRONTS FOR INTERNATIONAL BANKING CARTEL

“Synarchy...is ‘government by secret societies’,

or by a group of initiates who operate from behind the scenes. 

It is an analogue of ‘theocracy’, or rule by a priesthood.”

~ Marquis Alexandre Saint-Yves d’Alveydre

PART V

THE “JUDEO-CHRISTIAN” THEOCRACY

“When the King of Israel sets upon his sacred head the crown offered him by Europe he will become patriarch of the world... The King of the Jews will be the real Pope of the Universe, the Patriarch of the International Church.” (Protocols 15.23; 17.4)

THE SYNARCHY

AYN RAND / “THE TRUST”

THE SYNARCHY

In his book, Practical Idealism, Count Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi, founder of the International Pan European Union, wrote that the Jews were predestined to be a “future leader-nation” and a “new race of spiritual nobility.”

“The main representatives of the corrupt as well as the upright brain aristocracy: of capitalism, journalism and the literate are Jews. The superiority of their spirit predestines them to become a main factor of the future nobility. One look at the history of the Jewish people explains its lead in the struggle over the governance of humanity. For two thousand years Jewry was a religious community, made up of ethical and religious predisposed individuals from all nations of the classical cultural area, with a national Hebrew centre in Palestine.

“Instead of destroying Jewry, Europe, against its own will, refined and educated this people into a future leader-nation through this artificial selection process. No wonder that this people, that escaped Ghetto-Prison, developed into a spiritual nobility of Europe.

A new Noble Race by the Grace of the Spirit

“Therefore a gracious Providence provided Europe with a new race of nobility through spiritual grace... The prominent position held by Jewry these days is owed to its spiritual supremacy which enables it to  win the spiritual battle over enormous superior numbers of favored, hateful, jealous rivals.” (Practical Idealism, Count Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi, 1925)

Coudenhove-Kalergi’s words echoed the Protocols of Zion, which were signed by “the Representatives of Sion of the 33rd degree.”

“PER ME REGES REGNANT. ‘It is through me that Kings reign.’ And it was said by the prophets that we were chosen by God Himself to rule over the whole earth. God has endowed us with genius that we may be equal to our task.” (Protocol 5.6)

“God has granted to us, His Chosen People, the gift of the dispersion, and in this which appears in all eyes to be our weakness, has come forth all our strength, which has now brought us to the threshold of sovereignty over all the world.” (Protocol 11.8)

“In this difference in capacity for thought between the GOYIM and ourselves may be clearly discerned the seal of our position as the Chosen People and of our higher quality of humanness, in contradistinction to the brute mind of the GOYIM. Their eyes are open, but see nothing before them and do not invent (unless perhaps, material things). From this it is plain that nature herself has destined us to guide and rule the world.” (Protocol 15.11)

The reader will notice in the Protocols the reference to “Goyim,” which is a derogatory Yiddish term for “non-Jews.” 

“n. Offensive., pl. goy·im (goi’ĭm) or goys.
Used as a disparaging term for one who is not a Jew
Yiddish, from Hebrew gôy, Jew ignorant of the Jewish religion, non-Jew.” (Answers.com)

The above quoted Protocol 15, Section 11 reveals the ‘Learned Elders’ contempt for non-Jews.  In their view, Jews have a “higher quality of humanness, in contradistinction to the brute mind of the GOYIM. Their eyes are open, but see nothing before them...”  Why do the Jews have a higher quality of human life than the Gentiles?  The Goyim “eyes are open, but see nothing before them.” The expression is an allusion to “second sight” or “clairvoyance,” which is the supernatural power of seeing objects or actions removed in space or time from natural viewing.”  (“Clairvoyance”)  Those who are enlightened or illuminated also receive instructions from “spirit entities,” i.e., fallen angels (Lucifer and his demons), who, in exchange for their souls, confer upon them supernatural power to perform magic.

To prepare the Jews for their destiny as rulers of the world, the Learned Elders have mainstreamed the Kabbalah, the sourcebook of their occult doctrine, throughout Jewry. Kabbalah has made great inroads into North American Jewry where interest in Jewish occultism has risen dramatically.

“…A more traditional American Orthodox rabbi, Aryeh Kaplan, spent the seventies and early eighties reconstructing the forgotten Jewish meditative tradition by researching long-neglected kabbalistic texts, many only extant in manuscript. He boldly disregarded the centuries-old rabbinic ban on the dissemination of kabbalistic practices among those under forty and unschooled in Bible and Talmud—a result of the Shabbetai Tzvi tragedy—by teaching Jewish meditation classes and publishing practical manuals and source readers on the subject. Thanks largely to Kaplan’s efforts, many Orthodox rabbis and lay people have taught and written about Kabbalah, recognizing its appeal to non-practicing Jews searching for spiritual guidance.” (Michael Sidlofsky,“Kabbalah—A Brief History”)

Since the unenlightened Gentiles are unfit to govern their own lands, the Learned Elders must consolidate and rule over the nations of the world. Their megalomaniacal plan was obstructed when the ‘anti-Semitic’ Vichy regime banned Masonic societies, and so they renamed their program the Synarchist Movement of Empire (S.M.E.) after the 19th century Synarchist movement founded by Joseph Alexandre Saint-Yves d’Alveydre (1842-1909) who had been the Grand Master of the Martinist Order.

“The Vichy regime legislated against Freemasonry, and co-operated with the Germans in identifying and acting against Masons. But, even within the regime itself, people were very doubtful that Freemasonry had genuinely been banished. In the so-called‘Chavin Report’, which seems to have originated from within or near government circles, allegations were made that large number of people in responsible positions belonged to Masonic political groups called ‘synarchist’ which had been in existence since the 1920s. These synarchists were supposed to have been inspired in part by the doctrine of Saint-Yves d’Alveydre. They were represented as a group of influential politicians, businessmen, and so-called ‘technocrats’ who had been plotting to seize power ever since a reputed ‘Synarchist Revolutionary Pact’ of 1922.’”—Peter Partner, The Murdered Magicians (Secrets of the Knights Templar: The Modern Merovingian Connection: Vichy France)

And so, it was “under a sophisticated Catholic disguise they called Synarchy,” that the Judeo-Masonic societies banned by the Vichy regime launched the Pan European movement.

“The new book ‘The Sion Revelation: The truth about the guardians of Christ’s Sacred Bloodline’ by Lynn Picknett and Clive Prince states in the conclusion:  ‘Yet as we have seen from dozens of checkable associations and links, it seems that at leastthe concept of the European Union is the product of an occult conspiracy, inspired by individuals who believed they were in contact with spirit entities, with the ultimate aim of establishing a full-blown United States of Europe in line with Joseph Alexandre Saint-Yves d’Alveydre’s original vision.’

“The heart of the book zeroes in on ‘The Rectified Scottish Rite’ — not the Scottish system of the U.S. but a different, highly esoteric system. This makes sense according to professor Hugh B. Urban’s article on French Freemasonry and full-lotus yoga meditation. The leaders of this order depend on channeling higher spirits.” (“Synarchy: Beyond Left and Right”)

According to Masonic authors, Lynn Picknett and Clive Prince, Synarchy is a theocracy ruled by secret societies whose enlightened initiates receive their instructions from spiritual intelligences.

“[Schwaller de Lubicz] also always concealed the influences that shaped his own philosophy, but an examination of his ideology places him firmly in the context of a specific politico-esoteric system, a movement known as Synarchy. This is ‘government by secret societies’, or by a group of initiates who operate from behind the scenes. It is an analogue of ‘theocracy’, or rule by a priesthood. Schwaller de Lubicz was a fervent Synarchist which is why he admired ancient Egypt so much, ruled as it was by divine kings and priesthoods...” (The Stargate Conspiracy, p. 263)

The Pan European Union was a front for Synarchy, whose larger objective was world government. The Synarchists claim that Agarttha is “the underground headquarters of the King of the World.” According to one source “...there are Aghartans who have reincarnated on earth in our day in order to bring us their science, their organization and their form of government: government by Initiates.” (On Synarchy)

From Foucault’s Pendulum:

“Because if the Masters of the World exist, they can only be underground; this is a truth that all sense but few dare utter. Perhaps the only man bold enough to say it in print was Saint-Yves d’Alveydre. You know him?”

“He is the one who told us about Agartha, the underground headquarters of the King of the World, the occult center of the Synarchy,” the taxidermist said. “He had no fear; he felt sure of himself. But all those who spoke out after him were eliminated, because they knew too much.” (On Synarchy)

The writings of Saint-Yves d’Alveydre revealed Agarttha to be, not an underground location, but “a Trinitarian unity and Synarchy of Judeo-Christians” with its roots in the “Jewish School of Alexandria, seeking by means of unification, through many Judœo-Christian sects, to dominate and secretly rule the Western World.”  In other words, Synarchy, which according to Webster, means “joint rule or sovereignty,” is a Judeo-Christian theocracy ruled by Jewish Elders:

“Having read Mission de l’Inde en Europe, Mission de l’Europe en Asia, written in 1886 by Saint-Yves d’Alveydre, we are led to conclude that is more or less symbolic, that Agarttha is of no one country, of no one nation, but universal; that the hierarchy is, apparently, a group of cabalistic and gnostic magi and initiates, having links with the Jewish School of Alexandria, seeking by means of unification, through many Judœo-Christian sects, to dominate and secretly rule the Western World and eventually unite the East with the West; that in all probability the mysterious subterranean libraries merely consist of what is known as the ‘Akashic Records’—akasa meaning ether, which according to these initiates has imprinted upon it all past, present, and future world happenings...

“In support of our opinion of the nature of Agarttha we quote from the above book by Saint-Yves d’Alveydre. He explains that ‘the name of Agarttha signifies impossible to be taken by violence and inaccessible to anarchy.’ In itself he says it is a Trinitarian unity and Synarchy of Judeo-Christians, as opposed to ‘general government by brute force, that is, military conquest, political tyranny, sectarian intolerance, and colonial rapacity.’ Everywhere to-day it looks as if an attempt were being made to rule the world by some such Synarchic hierarchy of men, politically, religiously, and economically.

“It was Agarttha too ‘who, at the beginning of modern times, everywhere renewed, through the Judeo-Christians, the thousands of associations developed today under the name of Freemasonry. As Schuré wrote: ‘The tradition of esoteric Christianity, properly speaking, is directly and uninterruptedly attached to the famous and mysterious Manes, founder ofManichœism, who lived in Persia in the fourth century.’ This sect arose out of the Jewish School of Alexandria.

“Like Mazzini who cried: Associate! Associate! Associate!  Saint-Yves d’Alveydre’s cry was:

“‘Synarchy! Synarchy! Synarchy! thus save your tiaras, your universities, your crowns, your republics, all that is yours, all, including what was legitimate in the Revolution of 1789 in its social promises, that the Synarchy Judœo-Christian alone can maintain and accomplish. Unite in that Law, teaching bodies, ecclesiastic or laie; juridical bodies; economic bodies.’” (The Trail of the Serpent, pp. 313-315)

Saint-Yves d’Alveydre, who was a Kabbalist, owed his concept of Synarchy to the Kabbalistic Order of the Rose Cross, whose leaders were in communication with the “Masters of the Occident,” — the Ascended Masters of the Hierarchy channeled by Alice Bailey.

“Papus, as a witness and participant in the birth of other British Rose+Croix currents of origin...wrote this about the Kabbalistic Order of the Rose-Cross :

“‘The Rose+Cross movement would have continued in silence, and been isolated from other initiatory organizations, if foreign occultists had not claimed to bring it out of France which was a the place of birth of the Western traditions—at its origins, to involve it in a movement which was to change the axis of gravitation of esotericism; to place the center of gravity of the movement outside of Paris [...] It would have been a sacrilege to allow the work of the Masters of the Occident to be destroyed. Thus, it was decided (high up in the organization) that a movement of diffusion would be undertaken, which was intended to select by work and by examination those initiates who would be able to adapt the esoteric tradition to the century that lay before them.”...

“The following generations of French and European occultists perpetuating the initiatory traditions and of the mysteries of Occident were largely influenced by this unique school. Such was also the case...for Saint-Yves d’Alveydre [1842-1909] and his concept of ‘Synarchy’ and for Rudolph Steiner.” (Ordre Kabbalistique de la Rose-Croix)

The legendary founder of the Rose Croix, “Christian Rosenkreutz,” was the main character of the Rosicrucian manifestos. The third manifesto,The Chymical Wedding of Christian Rosenkreutz, is an allegorical romance depicting the spiritual marriage of Christianity and Jewish Cabalism—called by the oxymoron “Christian Cabalism” in the Middle Ages. The Rosicrucian manifestos heralded the restoration of the “true Christianity” based on a right understanding of the Holy Scripture which could be attained by means of the Jewish Cabala. The envisioned Synarchy would be a Judeo-Christian theocracy based on Cabala/Kabbalah, as depicted also in Francis Bacon’s Atlantis. (See: “Christian Cabala”)

What Christians are not told is that the Synarchist theocracy calls for a highly organized state with a rigid two-caste system governed by a predestined “enlightened elite,” the Jewish priest-kings, whose claim to authority is that it “is in direct contact with, and receives its instructions from, the spiritual intelligences that rule the universe—rather like the theocratic pharaohs of ancient Egypt, who were both secular rulers and intermediaries between the gods and the people.” 

“Saint-Yves’s concept of synarchy was essentially a reaction to the rise of anarchy and therefore the opposite—a highly ordered method of government based on what he believed were universal laws and principles.  Everything and everybody had its place and purpose; harmony is achieved by keeping to that place and fulfilling that purpose, whereas any circumvention of those natural laws leads to disaster. Everyone has to remain in his or her allotted station in life.  (Papus likened the individual’s relationship to a nation or race to the cell’s relationship to the body. As each was preordained to fulfill a specific function, attempting to do anything else would only cause problems for both the individual and the organism as a whole.)

“His works outlined an ambitious, visionary program for establishing synarchy in France and beyond.  Each state must be highly organized at every level, with everyone in his or her own specific place; otherwise anarchy would triumph. Challenging one’s status would not be tolerated.

“However, the concept that everyone has a preordained place and role means that some people are naturally intended to lead: in other words, Saint-Yves advocated government by a predestined elite. And although much of his work is about the practicality of applying synarchy to the government of society, at its core it is an essentially spiritual or mystical philosophy.  The elite is spiritually attuned to the universal laws—effectively a priesthood.  Synarchy is therefore a form of theocracy, rule by priests or priest-kings.

“Synarchy even suggests that this enlightened elite is in direct contact with, and receives its instructions from, the spiritual  intelligences that rule the universe—rather like the theocratic pharaohs of ancient Egypt, who were both secular rulers and intermediaries between the gods and the people.  Saint-Yves himself believed he was in contact with invisible forces. But as Andre Ulmann and Henri Azeau point out in their 1968 Synarchy and Power (Synarchie et pouvoir), ultimately such elites are always self-selected.” (The Sion Revelation, pp. 338-339)

In the Synarchist theocracy of enlightened Jews ruling unenlightened Gentiles, social mobility will be nonexistent.

“The Goyim...do not see the urgent necessity of what we, when our kingdom comes, shall adopt at once, namely this, that it is essential to teach in national schools one simple, true piece of knowledge, the basis of all knowledge of the structure of human life, of social existence, which requires division of labor, and, consequently, the division of men into classes and conditions. It is essential for all to know that owing to difference in the objects of human activity there cannot be any equality... After a thorough study of this knowledge, the peoples will voluntarily submit to authority and accept such position as is appointed them in the State.” (Protocol 3.10)

Behind the Synarchist conspiracy was the high cabal, the Prieuré de Sion, and its front, Alpha Galates, whose enlightened initiates directed the political movement for the Pan European Union.

“The ‘Knight Beneficent of the Holy City’ is the highest grade and is another name for the Templars.

“‘We were utterly astounded to discover that Schwaller de Lubicz and synarchy led us right back to the same groups — including the Martinist Order and the Knights Beneficient — which we had already identified as being behind the Priory of Sion. So we were intrigued to find that not only had Jean Cocteau and Schwaller de Lubicz corresponded for many years but Cocteau had stayed with the Lubiczes at Luxor during a tour of Egypt in 1949.’*

“It’s well documented in the book that the Synarchist Conspiracy of the 1940s in Europe was also the main force for a United States of Europe. ‘Here we have two politicians, instrumental in creating the first step toward the EU, one of whom (Schuman) had belonged to a think tank organized by Louis Le Fue [sic]of Alpha Galates, and the other (Monnet) who had been involved in the preward synarchist milieu.’ Mitterand is considered a protégé of Monnet.” (“Synarchy: Beyond Left and Right”)

*Prieuré de Sion Grand Master from 1918-1963, Jean Cocteau, and French Freemason and Egyptologist, Schwaller de Lubicz, a protofascist who influenced the Nazi Party.

Joseph Alexandre Saint-Yves d’Alveydre, who founded the Synarchist movement in the 19th century and was Grand Master of the Martinist Order, was a friend of Victor Hugo, who was Grand Master of the Prieuré de Sion from 1844 to 1885.  The membership of the Martinist Order were from “High Industry, the High Finance, and the Aristocracy”  Strategically placed, the Synarchists were “in positions of power to take over the three key institutions of social control: political, religious and economic.”

“The founder of Synarchy, a Frenchman named Joseph Alexandre Saint-Yves d’Alveydre (1824-1909), explained that the term was the opposite of anarchy. Whereas anarchy is based on the principle that the state should have no control over individuals, Synarchy proposes that it should have complete control. He proposed that Synarchists achieve power by taking over the three key institutions of social control: political, religious and economic. With its own members in positions of power, the Synarchists would, in effect, secretly govern entire states. And why stop there? One of the aims of Synarchy, from its very inception, was—from the words of a Synarchist document—the creation of a ‘federal European Union’. Is it any coincidence that we are now moving rapidly towards such a European state.” (The Stargate Conspiracy, p. 263)

Part II: Financial Vampires documented that the goal of British Intelligence MI6 operations was to establish a European Union controlled by multinational corporations. Also that MI6 collaborated with First National Bank of Chicago whose President was Gaylord Freeman, the President of First National Bank of Chicago and Grand Master of the Prieuré de Sion from 1963 to 1981. The Synarchists were not only high initiates of the Synagogue of Satan, their occupations were heads of industry, financiers and bankers. They were/are the modern Knights Templars who were the Jewish bankers of medieval Europe.

“The Synarchist movement is an international movement born after the Versailles Treaty, which was financed and directed by certain financial groups belonging to the top international banking community.  Its aim is essentially to overthrow in every country, where they exist, the parliamentary regimes which are considered insufficiently devoted to the interests of these groups and therefore, too difficult to control because of the number of persons required to control them.

“S.M.E. proposes therefore to substitute them by authoritarian regimes more docile and more easily maneuverable. Power would be concentrated in the hands of the CEO’s of industry and in designated representatives of chosen banking groupsfor each country.” (“Synarchy Movement of Empire”)

The existence of the Synarchist conspiracy is documented in mainstream sources.

“In his new popular history, The Collapse of the Third Republic (New York, 1969, pp. 237-38), William L. Shirer credulously assigns the Synarchy a ‘considerable’ role in undermining the [French] Republic.” (“The Legend of the Vichy Synarchy,” Richard F. Kuisel, French Historical Studies, Vol. 6, No. 3 (Spring, 1970), pp. 365-398)
 

“...the following statement by one of the leading globalist strategists, Mr David Rockefeller, published in 2002... As will be seen, David Rockefeller acknowledges that he is part of a secret cabal (synarchy) which works against the best interests of the United States:

“‘For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicised incidents such as my encounter with Castro, to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over the American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it’. (David Rockefeller, ‘Memoirs’, Random House, New York, 2002, page 405.)” (“Banksters and Officials Tightening Own Noose”)
 

AYN RAND / “THE TRUST”

Alexandre Kojève (1902-1968) was born in Russia and emigrated to France. He was a leading figure in the Synarchist conspiracy and in the creation of the European Union. In the 1920s, Kojève was the leader of a group of Russian emigrés in Berlin and Paris who supported the Bolshevik Revolution, which was financed by the Warburg banking family which also funded Count Coudenhove-Kalergi who co-founded the Pan European Union. The Synarchist, Alexandre Kojève, spent most of his life in France where he “worked in the French Ministry of Economic Affairs as one of the chief planners of the European Common Market.”  

“Kojeve...secured a job in the Direction des relations economiques exterieures, and for the next twenty years, he was according to everyone who worked with him the eminence grise of French economic policy. He was involved in diplomatic events and treaties whose significance continues to define our century. After helping to implement the Marshall Plan, he was involved in promoting the European Economic Community (now the European Union).” (Gallery of Russian Thinkers)

Alexandre Kojève was “an eminence grise (French for ‘grey eminence’)—a powerful advisor or decision-maker who operates secretly or unofficially.” He was also a Russian spy for the “Soviet secret service project called ‘the Trust.’”

“Saint-Yves’ successor, Gerard Vincent Encausse (‘Papus’),...

“Both Saint-Yves and Papus envisioned a global Synarchist empire, divided into five geographic areas: 1. the British Empire; 2. Euro-Africa; 3. Eurasia; 4. Pan-America; 5. Asia. Indeed, Alexandre Kojève is identified in Russian sources as a leader of the so-called ‘Eurasians,’ a group of Russian emigrés in the 1920s Berlin and Paris, led by Sir Samuel Hoare’s Guchkov and tied into the Soviet secret service project called ‘the Trust.’ The ‘Eurasians’ welcomed the Russian Revolution as a purgative force to wipe out corrupt Western civilization. Kojève’s own cosmology of great tyrants counted Josef Stalin and Adolf Hitler as second only to Napoleon, in achieving the ‘end of history’ goal of a true global tyranny.” (“Synarchism: The Fascist Roots of the Wolfowitz Cabal”) 

According to a CIA file, “The Trust” was a controlled opposition stealth operation whose purpose was “penetration and manipulation of anti-communist Russian groups in exile, from 1922 to 1927.” (United States. Central Intelligence Agency typescript: The Trust)  The modus operandi of the Jewish Elders of Sion is to preempt their opponents by neutralizing any and all opposition to their schemes.  For example, they neutralize opposition to Communism by posing as anti-Communists and through the creation of front organizations achieve control over genuine anti-Communists who might organize against them. A good example of this a controlled-opposition front is the John Birch Society, which was founded by Communists.

The tentacles of “The Trust” extended far beyond Europe, even to the United States. Another Russian emigré was Ayn Rand, the Jewish atheist who arrived in the United States in 1926, the same period that the Russian agent, Alexandre Kojève, emigrated to France.

“‘Rand’ was born Alisa Zinov’yevna Rosenbaum in St. Petersburg, Russia, in 1905... ‘Ayn Rand’ came to America from Russia presenting herself as if a radical anti-Communist. Hers was the typical modus operandi of Bolshevik operatives working for an official Soviet organization known as ‘The Trust’. These agents, many of them crypto-Jews, came to the West in search of anti-Communists and infiltrated anti-Communist organizations and Western intelligence agencies. Their objective was to forward the interests of Communism by creating a controlled opposition to Communism which would serve the interests of the Communists while pretending to fight them. They also subverted all authentic anti-Communist movements.

“Rand promoted negative stereotypes of women, attacked homosexuals, advocated laissez faire Capitalism, and taught selfishness and disregard for humanity. She opposed charity and objected to any governmental assistance for those without means. She wanted to place America on the ruinous Gold Standard.

“Rosenbaum’s ‘good advice’ to the blacks only held them back by preventing them from using the political process to forward their interests. Her good advice to the Goyim only held the Gentiles back, by making them selfish and irresponsible, and also by preventing them from using their government to better themselves and their neighbors. She taught the Gentiles to hate the poor, undermine the middle class and concentrate wealth in the hands of the wealthiest Jews, all in the name of ‘fighting Communism’. Her ‘good advice’ pitted Goys against one another at the time when they should have been helping one another to become successful. She taught Gentiles to shun any efforts to cooperate in their communities and improve the lot of one another.

“While Jews famously provided communal support and charitable assistance for their own, Rosenbaum helped to create the destructive ‘me generation’ attitudes in Americans, which undermined the good nature of Christianity, weakened communities and inhibited the advancement of the poor and middle class. Her beliefs also fostered the drug culture, pornography and the destruction of public education. While Jews promoted strong community ties, Rosenbaum taught the Goyim to be selfish and‘independent’, meaning without any sense of social responsibility or communal cohesion.

“While Jews wisely took from the public schools all they could, Frederick T. Gates, an agent of World Jewry, used Rockefeller/ Rothschild money to finance institutions of higher learning which benefited Jews, while promoting the idea that Gentile students should be readied for factory work and work as field hands and farmers. While World Jewry took the monies they stole from Gentiles and distributed them charitably to their own, Rosenbaum taught Gentiles to abandon all social responsibility, obsessively focus on themselves, and destroy all government institutions which better the lot of the American middle class and poor.

“Alisa Rosenbaum’s ‘anti-Communist’ philosophies weakened Americans opening the door for Communism. I suspect she was an agent of ‘The Trust’.”  (“Ron Paul, ‘Ayn Rand’ and ‘The Trust’”)

Ayn Rand authored the popular books, The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged. Readers unfamiliar with these tomes can listen to Rand’s 1959 interview with Mike Wallace in which she expounds her philosophy of “Objectivism” and “rational self-interest.” Before an American audience, Rand disparaged God and Christianity, promoted Marxist atheism and unbridled capitalism wherein the pursuit of self-interest is the highest virtue. Rand redefined morality as the individual’s pursuit of his own happiness to the exclusion of others’ needs, while condemning altruism and charity as immoral because the recipients are unworthy, or they would help themselves and refuse help from others. One only need to listen to Ayn Rand to recognize that her philosophy is the fountainhead of the self-absorbed and atheistic “Me Generation,” as well as the uncharitable self-interest that defines much of the Conservative movement. 

“This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.” (2 Timothy 3:1-5)

A byproduct of Ayn Rand’s philosophy of rational self-interest is class warfare, a major theme of Communist agitators. Today, the strident rhetoric of Conservative TV and radio hosts who daily vilify Liberals and pander to the self-interest of their Conservative viewers only serves to widen the economic and social chasm between the rich and the poor.  Ayn Rand was a Synarchist, in the mold of Saint-Yves d’Alveydre, whose paradoxical ideology proposed to eliminate class struggle by reducing mankind to slavery under a ruling elite.

“Saint Yves d’Alveydre...was determined to find a political formula that could lead to a more harmonious society. Synarchy in opposition to Anarchy. A European society ruled by three councils representing the economical power, the executive power and the spiritual power, that is, the churches and the scientists. An enlightened oligarchy through which class struggle could be eliminated.” (Umberto Ecco, “The Pendulum of Foucault”)

Ayn Rand framed her thesis as a false dichotomy between socialism and capitalism, liberal and conservative, a dialectic which has been perpetuated by the mainstream media. This left-right dialectic has obfuscated the reality of a criminal Jewish cabal that conspires to destroy mankind.

Within Ayn Rand’s inner-circle named “The Collective” was Alan Greenspan, the future Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board. Greenspan studied economics under the tutelage of future Federal Reserve chairman Arthur Burns, who was instructed by Ludwig von Mises at the Rockefeller-funded New York University. While Alan Greenspan belonged to “The Collective” he was also the Chair of President Gerald Ford’s Council of Economic Advisors.

“Rand’s magnum opus, the 1,100-page Atlas Shrugged, was published in 1957... The theme of Atlas Shrugged is ‘the role of the mind in man’s existence—and, as a corollary, the demonstration of a new moral philosophy: the morality of rational self-interest... she formed a group (jokingly designated ‘The Collective’) which included future Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan... [O]n March 6, 1982,...Rand’s funeral was attended by some of her prominent followers, including Alan Greenspan.” (“Ayn Rand”)

“The Collective” was no joke. Ayn Rand, who launched the anti-communist propaganda campaign in the U.S., was, in reality, a Communist agent commissioned to destroy the moral values and the economy of the United States.

The von Misians who are her disciples are also controlled opposition agents. Ayn Rand’s teachings on laissez faire capitalism were the teachings of Ludwig von Mises and the Austrian School, the Mont Pelerin Society, the Eugenics Societies, and the Chicago School, as well as the Republican and Libertarian Parties.

“The New York Times journalist Henry Hazlitt and his wife had been friends of Rand and her husband even before her success with The Fountainhead, and in the 1940s Hazlitt introduced her to the Austrian School economist Ludwig von Mises. Both men expressed an admiration for Rand, and, despite her philosophical differences with them, Rand strongly endorsed the writings of both men throughout her career.

“She has also had an influence on a number of notable people in different fields. Examples include philosophers such as John Hospers, George H. Smith, Allan Gotthelf, Robert Mayhew and Tara Smith, economists such as George Reisman and Murray Rothbard, psychologists such as Edwin A. Locke, historians such as Robert Hessen, and political writers such as Charles Murray. United States Congressmen Ron Paul  and Bob Barr, and Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States Clarence Thomas have acknowledged her influence on their lives, and former United States President Ronald Reagandescribed himself as an ‘admirer’ of Rand in private correspondence in the 1960s.” (“Ayn Rand”)

“The founding members [of the Mont Pelerin Society] included [Friedrich von Hayek’s] teacher von Mises, his close friend and colleague at the LSE, the philosopher Karl Popper, and some famous economists of what came to be known as the Chicago School, including Frank H. Knight, and the Nobel Laureates Milton Friedman and George Stigler.” (F.A. Hayek)

“The Objectivist philosophy of Ayn Rand was referred to earlier. Although as unacademic as Popper was academic, Rand did share with him a number of philosophic premises; such as dedication to metaphysical realism, opposition to conceptual realism, and rejection of determinism and subjectivism. Indeed Wallace Matson has suggested that Rand and Popper had ‘much in common.’ His view has been partially endorsed by Robert Hollinger, who has written of ‘parallels’ between the two thinkers.” (R. Hollinger, ‘Ayn Rand’s Epistemology in Historical Perspective,’ in The Philosophic Thought of Ayn Rand, D. Den Uyl & D. Rasmussen Eds. (Urbana, Ill: University of Illinois Press, 1984), p. 56.) (“A Critique of Karl Popper’s Critical Rationalism”)

PART VI

THE LIBERTARIAN REVOLUTION