Much of what Sheikh Hosein says is wise.
From the below article:
"I brought to public attention Allah’s command in the Qur’ān which sternly prohibited Muslims from entering into precisely that alliance with NATO with which those misguided Muslims were eventually able to achieve their immediate objective in
He was crucified as it is written in the Holy Qur'an.Surah 3 - Ali 'Imran - THE FAMILY OF 'IMRANAyat 003:055And God said: Oh Jesus! I am causing you to die, and lifting you up to Me, and cleansing you of those who blasphemed, and making those who follow you above those who blasphemed, until the Day of Resurrection when to Me shall all of you return. Then I will judge between you on the strained points of matters upon which the whole unreasoning had disputed.
FURTHER LESSONS FROM THE ZIONIST ATTACK ON LIBYA
FURTHER LESSONS FROM THE ZIONIST ATTACK ON LIBYA |
Articles - Islam and Politics |
Tuesday, 14 Shawwal 1432
Explaining this lesson one more time
It is so sad that the few critics who commented negatively on my last essay on Libya studiously avoided commenting on or responding to my most serious charge against those Muslims who participated in/supported the well-armed and long-planned insurrection that toppled the Libyan government in the capital city of Tripoli.
I brought to public attention Allah’s command in the Qur’ān which sternly prohibited Muslims from entering into precisely that alliance with NATO with which those misguided Muslims were eventually able to achieve their immediate objective in Libya of seizing the capital city of Tripoli and then claiming recognition as the new government:
{يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُواْ لاَ تَتَّخِذُواْ الْيَهُودَ وَالنَّصَارَى أَوْلِيَاء بَعْضُهُمْ أَوْلِيَاء بَعْضٍ وَمَن يَتَوَلَّهُم مِّنكُمْ فَإِنَّهُ مِنْهُمْ إِنَّ اللّهَ لاَ يَهْدِي الْقَوْمَ الظَّالِمِينَ}
“O you who have faith (in Allah) do not take (such) Jews and (such) Christians as your friends and allies who themselves are friends and allies of each other. And whoever from amongst you turns to them (for friendship and alliance) now belong to them (and not to us). Surely Allah does not guide a wicked people.”
(Qur’ān, al-Māida, 5:51)
They must know that the Qur’an does not here refer to individual friendship between a Jew and a Christian. Rather, the Qur’an anticipated more than 1400 years ago the mysterious reconciliation that was forged between most European Christians and European Jews - a reconciliation in which the Vatican played a strategically important role by way of exonerating Jews from responsibility for the crucifixion of Jesus the true Messiah (‘alaihi al-Salām).
As recently as a few months ago Pope Benedict released a new book in which he cleverly argued that “there is no basis in Scripture for the argument that the Jewish people as a whole were responsible for Jesus' death”. How could the Jewish people as a whole bear responsibility for the crucifixion when there were many Jews who accepted Jesus as the Messiah and hence had no part in the demand for his crucifixion? Did they cease to be Jews when they believed in Jesus as the promised Messiah?
The Pope’s comments concealed the community of Rabbis who rejected Jesus’ claim to be Messiah – and who to this day still reject that claim – and who were most certainly responsible for demanding his crucifixion. Unless succeeding generations of Jews publicly dissociate themselves from the manifestly sinful conduct of those Jews who (in the name of Jewish law) demanded his crucifixion, and unless they condemn that sinful Jewish conduct, they will continue from generation to generation to share in responsibility as Jews for that foul Jewish deed. If they do not believe me, then let them just wait and see what happens in the grave for example, when they seek shelter behind the Vatican’s bogus declaration proclaiming their non-responsibility!
|
Reconciliation between European Christians and European Jews paved the way for the emergence of the Zionist Judeo-Christian alliance which is now waging war on Islam and Muslims on Israel’s behalf, and which has NATO as its military arm. I have identified that Zionist alliance with Gog of the Qur’an (see my book entitled ‘An Islamic View of Gog and Magog in the Modern World’).
The misguided Muslims who entered into that prohibited alliance with the American-led NATO in order to topple the Libyan government must know that they have lost their Islam, and that unless they make Tauba (repentance) they will die as a part of the Zionist alliance which has the word KAFIR written on its forehead.
I pray that this essay might Insha Allah wake them up from their misguided conduct and that they will hasten to make Tauba and return to Islam before it becomes too late to do so. I fear that their Zionist friends will inevitably turn their guns on them in order to clear the way for the coming Zionist attack on Egypt. Was this not the fate which befell Pakistan’s President Zia ul Haq and Saudi King Faisal (rahimahumullah) who both dared to defy them after having previously submitted to them?
There remains one part of this puzzle which defies explanation. Why did Russia and China support the UN Security Council resolution which permitted NATO military intervention in Libya? Were these two States really that dumb that they could not foresee the consequences of their support for the resolution? Or is there more to this than meets the eye?
Russia and China are well aware that the Zionist West is obsessed with the completely irrational goal of delivering to Israel the rule over the whole world. I believe that they are also both well aware that the Zionist 9/11 false-flag attack on America was meant to facilitate the launching of wars that would reduce the Arab and Muslim worlds into a state of submission to Israel. The Islamic eschatological explanation for the pursuit of that irrational goal was provided in my book entitled ‘Jerusalem in the Qur’an’.
That obsession has caused the Zionists to lose the capacity for rational strategic thought. Russia and China are not only both nuclear-armed, but are also both proud nations that would never submit to Jewish Israeli ruleover them. The Zionists can neither intimidate Russia and China, nor can they succeed in bribing them into submission. The suspiciously clumsy Zionist effort made in Georgia in 2008 at the height of the American presidential election campaign to bait Russia on John Mc Cain’s behalf ended in embarrassing failure. Let us not forget that Putin gave the Zionists a bloody nose in Georgia and in so doing also gave notice of how Russia will respond the next time around.
It seems to me that the Russian and Chinese refusal to veto the Security Council’s resolution concerning Libya was no accident. Rather I want to suggest that Russia and China decided, coldly and deliberately, to sacrifice Libya. As a consequence there was no obstacle delaying or preventing Russian recognition of the post Gadhafi government. If I am correct, then that deliberate sacrifice provides startling new evidence, like nothing else ever before, of their long-term strategic planning of allowing NATO to be sucked even deeper into what will eventually become a Middle East quagmire (i.e., a military grave-yard or cemetery) from which there will be no escape for NATO. Perhaps the Russian strategy is to wait until NATO is in the most vulnerable military position before it launches its attack. When Russia does attack, that will be the war of Gog and Magog which Christian and Jewish scholarships have both been grappling to understand, and which only Islamic scholarship can accurately explain.
Islamic eschatology provides ample explanation of that end-time clash of the titans which will result in their mutual destruction. More importantly, it will leave Israel completely defenseless (see my book entitled ‘An Islamic View of Gog and Magog in the Modern World’). I expect that nuclear clash of the titans to take place within the next 20-30 years, and when it does take place it will result in the Dukhān (i.e., smoke) that is one of the Signs of the Last Day.
Before the clash can take place however, the world will witness the Zionist-controlled NATO continue its pig-headed obsession by biting even more in Pakistan, Egypt, Iran etc., than it can ever possibly chew and swallow, and Jesus (‘alaihi al-Salām) must return. Putin is smart. Truth will triumph. Truth is in Islam.
*****
_____________________________________________________________________________________
|
The Final Trial: Parousia of Jesus Christ Our Lord: Muslims and Christians both believe in the Resurrection and the Return of Christ and the Judgment
Traditional Catholic Prayers: The teaching of Jesus Christ
Surah 2 - Al Baqarah THE HEIFER
002.137 So if they believe as ye believe, they are indeed on the right path; but if they turn back, it is they who are in schism; but God will suffice thee as against them, and He is the All-Hearing, the All-Knowing.
002.138 The Baptism of God: And who can baptize better than God? And it is He Whom we worship.
002.139 Say: Will ye dispute with us about God, seeing that He is our Lord and your Lord; that we are responsible for our doings and ye for yours; and that We are sincere in Him?
The Lord thy God will raise up to thee a prophet of thy nation and of thy brethren like unto me: him thou shalt hear:
And they were scandalized in his regard. But Jesus said to them: A prophet is not without honour, save in his own country, and in his own house.
For Jesus himself gave testimony that a prophet hath no honour in his own country. [which testified that he was the prophet that Moses prophesied would be rejected by his and Moses own household, that is only Jesus.]
Going therefore, teach ye all nations; baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.
Jesus therefore cried out in the temple, teaching, and saying: You both know me, and you know whence I am: and I am not come of myself; but he that sent me, is true, whom you know not.
Luke 10:16
He that heareth you, heareth me; and he that despiseth you, despiseth me; and he that despiseth me, despiseth him that sent me.
Matthew 10:40
He that receiveth you, receiveth me: and he that receiveth me, receiveth him that sent me.
John 14:24
He that loveth me not, keepeth not my words. And the word which you have heard, is not mine; but the Father's who sent me.
Then Jesus said to his disciples: If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me.
Matthew 3:16 found 1
And Jesus being baptized, forthwith came out of the water: and lo, the heavens were opened to him: and he saw the Spirit of God descending as a dove, and coming upon him. [The Spirit of God was always with him. But this manifestation was for a public witness.]
Matthew 3:11
I indeed baptize you in the water unto penance, but he that shall come after me, is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear; he shall baptize you in the Holy Spirit and fire.
[21] And they asked him: What then? Art thou Elias? And he said: I am not. Art thou the prophet? And he answered: No. [22] They said therefore unto him: Who art thou, that we may give an answer to them that sent us? What sayest thou of thyself? [23] He said: I am the voice of one crying out in the wilderness, make straight the way of the Lord, as said the prophet Isaias. [24] And they that were sent, were of the Pharisees. [25] And they asked him, and said to him: Why then dost thou baptize, if thou be not Christ, nor Elias, nor the prophet? [26] John answered them, saying: I baptize with water; but there hath stood one in the midst of you, whom you know not. [27] The same is he that shall come after me, who is preferred before me: the latchet of whose shoe I am not worthy to loose. [28] These things were done in Bethania, beyond the Jordan, where John was baptizing. [29] The next day, John saw Jesus coming to him, and he saith: Behold the Lamb of God, behold him who taketh away the sin of the world. [30] This is he, of whom I said: After me there cometh a man, who is preferred before me: because he was before me.
[31] And I knew him not, but that he may be made manifest in Israel, therefore am I come baptizing with water. [32] And John gave testimony, saying: I saw the Spirit coming down, as a dove from heaven, and he remained upon him. [33] And I knew him not; but he who sent me to baptize with water, said to me: He upon whom thou shalt see the Spirit descending, and remaining upon him, he it is that baptizeth with the Holy Spirit. [34] And I saw, and I gave testimony, that this is the Son of God.
The Catholic Creed: It is a profound teaching of Catholicism
Let us make this clear before venturing onto the below. All men are called to salvation in Christ, Jew and Gentile alike.
It is a profound teaching of Catholicism that Jesus Christ took upon Himself flesh of ALL men from Adam on - subsumed from the Blessed Virgin Mary (see the genealogies of Christ from the Gospel of St. Matthew Chapter 1 and the Gospel of St. Luke Chapter 3). Therefore He is equally the Saviour of all men regardless of race or ethnicity. In contrast to this sublime truth is the lie that a particular race is the salvific hope of mankind and ultimately that a given individual of that particular race is a man-god and that race alone is human, such as the so-called Aryan Nazis and Hitler or 'the form of the elect of the nations' of Dr. Klausner and a "natural messiah" for them only and from them only – see below:
From:
The Point
Edited Under Fr. Leonard Feeney M.I.C.M. — Saint Benedict Center
June, 1957
THE REJECTED PEOPLE OF HOLY SCRIPTURE
Why the Jews Fear the Bible
Why The Jews Fear The Bible (June, 1957)The prime incentive for reading God’s word is always, of course, just that: it is God’s word — the thundering, inspired account of man’s long climb from Genesis to Apocalypse; how he fell from grace, how he was redeemed, what he must do to be saved.
But there is another reason also why now, particularly, we ought to take our Scriptures off the shelves. The notion has got around (at whose prompting, we will let you guess) that the Bible is a book which celebrates the Jews; and that since we Catholics are supposed to reverence the Bible, we ought also to honor the race to whom it is devoted.
The number of people who have been deceived by this artful dodge indicates one thing: how crass and colossal is our present-day ignorance of Holy Scripture.
No one could possibly read the seventy-two books which constitute God’s revelation and conclude that Jews deserve the esteem of Catholics. For albeit the Bible presents Jewish history, it is not the sort of history the Anti-Defamation League would approve. It is the story of how a few faithful Jews in each generation championed God against the rest of their race —a proud, stubborn, ungrateful, and unbelieving multitude. Far from promoting love for the Jews, the Bible is thus the font of Christian anti-Jewishness. No other book gives such a strong, sure taste of their perfidy.
It is in the New Testament that the Jews are shown at their ultimate worst — when they are confronted with the Messias, reject Him, crucify Him, call down His Blood as a curse upon them, and then do their utmost to prevent His gospel from being spread through the world. A partial report on this New-Testament portrayal of the Jews appears below. But even under the Old Law it is evident what the Jews are coming to. Prophet after prophet castigates them for their wickedness and warns them that they are going to be rejected by God in favor of the Gentiles; and prophet after prophet is killed by the Jews in defiant retort. As early as the book of Exodus, God has said to Moses: “See that this people is stiff-necked. Let me alone, that my wrath may be kindled against them, and that I may destroy them: and I will make of thee a great nation.” (Exodus 32:9)
Plainly, it is not for their own sakes, or for any goodness inherent in the race, that the Jews are kept at the center of the Old-Testament stage. It is, rather, because through some Jews — a holy, beleaguered handful, like Moses and Joshua and David and the prophets — the true Faith is kept alive down to the time of Our Lord. And the other reason for God’s sustained interest in the Jews is that eventually from their thorny midst there will blossom His one perfect creature, the Virginal Mother of His Son.
But if the Jews make such a poor showing in the Old Testament, how do they bear to read it? The answer is, they don’t. Their religious reading time is devoted to a post-Crucifixion book of their own devising, the Talmud. The Jews have rejected the first part of Holy Scripture as surely and as violently as they have rejected the second. Nor is it merely the treatment of their ancestors that the Jews object to; it is equally the Old Testament’s prophecies of the coming Messias, so blazingly and unmistakably fulfilled in Jesus. [Especially see Isaiah, chapters 52 and 53 and Daniel, chapter 11.]
Yet it should not be assumed that in shunning the Faith of Moses and David the Jews have abandoned all religious doctrine. Everyone familiar with Jewish practices knows that they still do believe most fervently in a Messias. And they profess this belief constantly — when they force Gentile merchants out of business and take over a city’s shopping district; when they take control of a nation’s newspapers and other means of disseminating ideas; when they demand that laws be passed forbidding anyone to speak against the Jews; when they drive a million Arabs from their homes and appropriate the land for themselves; when they insist that Western nations not only allow this outrage, but support it with their wealth and the blood of their youth — in all these ways and in hundreds of others, the Jews testify to their belief in a Messias.
And if anyone is still wondering who the Jews think the Messias is, Dr. Joseph Klausner, internationally recognized Jewish spokesman, supplies the answer. In his book, The Messianic Idea In Israel (Macmillan, 1955), Dr. Klausner declares that a personal savior has long since been an old-fashioned notion with the Jews and that, “Thus the whole people Israel, in the form of the elect of the nations, gradually became the Messiah of the world, the redeemer of mankind.”
It is out of that horrid racist idea of only Jews being human and elect of God that the Antichrist will emerge in his time.
The Catholic Creed: Rev. Paschal Huchede's view of the Antichrist
No comments:
Post a Comment